{"id":447,"date":"2016-10-09T13:17:12","date_gmt":"2016-10-09T12:17:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.paulplowman.com\/blog\/?p=447"},"modified":"2023-02-05T23:14:25","modified_gmt":"2023-02-05T23:14:25","slug":"contrarian-movie-reviews","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/paulplowman.com\/stuff\/contrarian-movie-reviews\/","title":{"rendered":"Contrarian Movie Reviews"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/paulplowman.com\/stuff\/wp-content\/rotten_tomatoes_8290.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/paulplowman.com\/stuff\/wp-content\/rotten_tomatoes_8290.jpg\" alt=\"Rotten Tomatoes logo\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-467\" width=\"232\" height=\"193\"><\/a>As a movie fan\/data nerd, I visit the website <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rottentomatoes.com\/\">Rotten Tomatoes<\/a> a lot. It&#8217;s a movie review aggregator site, which tells you what percentage of reviewers consider a movie a hit or a miss. Movies where more than 60% of reviewers consider it worth watching are classed as &#8220;Fresh&#8221;, while any movie with less than 60% good reviews is considered &#8220;Rotten&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not the most nuanced of review sites, but it gives you a good overview of critical opinion.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nAnother thing it allows you to do is see, at a glance, how certain reviewers review movies, and how often their opinions coincide, or not, with the general consensus. For instance, notorious contrarian <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rottentomatoes.com\/critic\/armond-white\">Armond White<\/a> only agrees with the consensus 53% of the time as I write this (Films he considers misses include: <em>The Wrestler<\/em>, <em>Toy Story 3<\/em>, <em>The Dark Knight<\/em>, <em>There Will Be Blood<\/em>. Films he considers hits: <em>Grown Ups<\/em>, <em>Jonah Hex<\/em>, <em>G.I.Joe 2<\/em>, <em>Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer<\/em>, <em>Transformers 2<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p>I wondered which critic disagreed with the consensus the most. Is there any critic, for example, who agreed with the general consensus 0% of the time?<\/p>\n<p>Well, a bit of Google-fu shows that there are lots of critics who are contrarian 100% of the time, but a deeper look shows that almost all of these have only reviewed one or maybe two movies. If you only review one movie, especially if that movie rates around 60%, then the chances of you giving slightly over 60% and the consensus being slightly under 60% (or vice-versa) are pretty good.<\/p>\n<p>So I decided that a critic had to have reviewed at least five movies. With that in mind, I found one person who had a 100% contrarian rate; And that person is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rottentomatoes.com\/critic\/rod-gudino\/\">Rod Gudino<\/a>! Yay!<\/p>\n<p>Rod has reviewed seven movies at the time of writing, between 2002 and 2006, and none of his ratings agree with the critical consensus. That&#8217;s quite an achievement.<\/p>\n<p>I guess it might also explain why he hasn&#8217;t had any movie reviews published in the last decade.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As a movie fan\/data nerd, I visit the website Rotten Tomatoes a lot. It&#8217;s a movie review aggregator site, which tells you what percentage of reviewers consider a movie a hit or a miss. Movies where more than 60% of reviewers consider it worth watching are classed as &#8220;Fresh&#8221;, while any movie with less than <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/paulplowman.com\/stuff\/contrarian-movie-reviews\/\">Read More &#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","category-movies"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/paulplowman.com\/stuff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/paulplowman.com\/stuff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/paulplowman.com\/stuff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/paulplowman.com\/stuff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/paulplowman.com\/stuff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=447"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/paulplowman.com\/stuff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1440,"href":"https:\/\/paulplowman.com\/stuff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447\/revisions\/1440"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/paulplowman.com\/stuff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/paulplowman.com\/stuff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/paulplowman.com\/stuff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}